| dc.contributor.author |
Kelly, Michael A. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Clark, S. P. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-11-19T20:06:35Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2012-11-19T20:06:35Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Kelly, M. A. and S. P. Clark (2011) "Returns in trading versus non-trading hours: The difference is day and night." Journal of Asset Management 12 (2): 132–145. |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10385/1012 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Market efficiency implies that the risk-adjusted returns from holding stocks during regular trading hours should be indistinguishable from the risk-adjusted returns from holding stocks outside those hours. We find evidence to the contrary. We use broad-based index exchange-traded funds for our analysis and the Sharpe ratio to compare returns. The magnitude of this effect is startling. For example, the geometric average close-to-open (CO) risk premium (return minus the risk-free rate) of the QQQQ from 1999–2006 was +23.7 per cent whereas the average open-to-close risk premium was −23.3 per cent with lower volatility for the CO risk premium. This result has broad implications for when investors should buy and sell broadly diversified portfolios. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Journal of Asset Management |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
anomaly |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
efficiency |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
ETF |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Sharpe ratio |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Returns in trading versus non-trading hours: The difference is day and night |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi |
10.1057/jam.2011.2 |
|