Science, religion, and hyper-Humeanism

DSpace/Manakin Repository

LDR Home . . . McLeod, Owen Publications of Owen McLeod View Item

Science, religion, and hyper-Humeanism

Show simple item record


dc.contributor.author McLeod, Owen
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-12T16:11:08Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-12T16:11:08Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier.citation McLeod, O. (2001) "Science, religion, and hyper-Humeanism." Philo 4 (1): 68-81. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3570
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10385/1007
dc.description.abstract According to hyper-Humeanism, the world of "fact" is utterly distinct from the realm of "value"-—that is, the realm of morality and religion. This is a well-known philosophical position, and it more or less follows from some well-known philosophical doctrines (e.g., logical positivism, and neo- Wittgensteinianism), but its appeal is not limited to philosophers. Indeed, an acceptance of hyper-Humeanism seems to be at the root of Stephen Jay Gould's recent defense of the thesis that science and religion are utterly distinct. Gould's stated aim in defending this thesis is to settle, or perhaps reveal as illusory, various conflicts between science and religion. However, I argue not only that Gould's version of this thesis is defective, but also that hyper- Humeanism itself is false. If I am right, then "facts" and "values"-—science and religion in particular—-can overlap in philosophically interesting ways. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Philo en_US
dc.title Science, religion, and hyper-Humeanism en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
McLeod-Philo-vol4-no1-SpringSummer2001.pdf 574.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search LDR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account